If the upstream proxy server requires authentication, either because an access rule allowing the traffic requires authentication, or because the web proxy listener is configured to authenticate all users, it will be necessary to configure the downstream proxy server to provide authentication credentials to the upstream proxy server. In some instances, for example when the upstream proxy server also handles direct requests from local clients, it may be necessary to require the downstream proxy server to authenticate. This effectively allows them to circumvent any access polices in place on the downstream proxy servers. Access rules on the upstream proxy server should restrict access only to the IP addresses of the downstream proxy servers. Access Controlīefore we continue, it is important to understand that controlling access on the upstream proxy servers is critical to the overall security of your proxy solution. If access controls are in place on the downstream proxy servers, but the upstream proxy servers are open, users will eventually discover this and connect directly to the upstream proxy server.
#Squidman add secure proxy how to#
In last month’s article, I demonstrated how to configure web proxy chaining with Forefront Threat Management Gateway (TMG) 2010 in a basic deployment scenario. In this second installment of a two-part series we’ll look at a more complex chaining scenario where authentication and conditional forwarding are required. I think this should work-I can't see what I've done wrong.If you would like to read the first part in this article series please go to Configuring Web Proxy Chaining with Forefront Threat Management Gateway (TMG) 2010 (Part 1). It is attached to a NSG that allows traffic on port 80 with $ sudo iptables -t nat -A OUTPUT -p tcp -dport 80 -j REDIRECT -to-port 8111Īfter doing that, I can verify that the port worksĪttached to the VM, set to 10.0.1.5, and it has a static Public IP, and $ sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -dport 80 -j REDIRECT -to-port 8111 However, external traffic is being rejected and I can't see what I've done wrong.Īfter rebooting, I added the following to iptables so that I could access port 80 port internally and externally: On an Ubuntu 16.04 VM in Azure, and I'm trying to forward external traffic on port 80 to INFO: RemoteControl::Accepting secure remote connections on /0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1:8112 INFO: RemoteControl::Accepting secure remote connections on /127.0.0.1:8112 INFO: RemoteControl::Accepting remote connections on /127.0.0.1:8111 The command window is useful in that you can see JOSM is listening for remote control commands. JOSM does have other load options to run on the command line options but the options do not allow you to create geometries. You have a delay in your plist file but is it long enough? But I am not sure if you are trying to start up JOSM and expect to have remote control fire from the command line. I've noted that remote control is the last INFO parm to display in the window before I see the JOSM splash screen.
You might want to run JOSM in a command/terminal. gnurk says, "You will find the ABE settings under the Advanced tab in the NoScript options dialog." The OSM Help Thread also provides ABE configuration examples for OSM related sites. The OSM Help Thread on JOSM remote control issues also points out potential remote control problems with Application Boundaries Enforcer, ABE, security features. (Error code:ssl_error_rx_record_too_long) The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified." In my case, I believe Chrome is the only work around that I have right now. ssl received a record that exceeded the maximum permissible length. The message is "An error occurred during a connection to 127.0.0.1:8111. Firefox is blocking my access because of a TLS Error issue. I looked at the Firefox issue by accessing. The Apple browser can be an issue to investigate if you are using the Apple browser to launch the report control command. The OSM.org issue may have to do with https. I've noted some issues from and the JOSM edit drop down option.
If the firewall is not the issue, then there may be something else listening on the ports. You may have to open ports 81 on your firewall. There is nothing wrong with your load_and_zoom example.
0 kommentar(er)
